Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by thfuran 1584 days ago
But then you're processing the whole list, probably defeating the point of breaking.
2 comments
appletrotter 1584 days ago
that's a performance optimization. you have other performance optimizations available often, with tradeoffs.

FP is a higher level paradigm so you might have to trade off with performance too

link
thfuran 1584 days ago
>FP is a higher level paradigm so you might have to trade off with performance too

Then it can hardly he said be to unequivocally be better, can it.

link
0ldskool 1584 days ago
that's like saying high level languages cannot be unequivocally better then writing assembly, not doing your own memory management is bad, etc...

Functional programming is a higher level abstraction. If the underlying implementation is not well implemented/optimized then you could have bad performance while the opposite is also true.

link
thfuran 1583 days ago
>that's like saying high level languages cannot be unequivocally better then writing assembly,

Yes, it is like saying that. At least, assuming by "cannot be" you mean "is not".

>not doing your own memory management is bad

No, it's not like saying that. Note how differently those claims are phrased.

link
bil7 1584 days ago
i don't understand what you mean. Are you referring to performance or implementation details?
link