|
|
|
|
|
by pydry
1595 days ago
|
|
We would need much much more of anything to make our power fully renewable. It's still cheaper and faster building pumped storage, wind and solar (all < 7 year lead time) than building nuclear plants (up to 20 years). This is not even accounting for the nearly free insurance granted to nuclear plants putting taxpayers on the hook for costs like the $800 billion cost of dealing with fukushima (which involved burning a lot of coal and gas). The economics of nuclear power as green energy only really make sense because it lets you share some of the rather high costs of maintaining a nuclear arsenal. The environmental movement is being coopted/guilted into supporting its subsidization. |
|
Any numbers on that pumped storage? how much is needed to store 1 week of France energy needs ? How much it costs then?