|
|
|
|
|
by jsty
1596 days ago
|
|
Major incidents aside, I always think that cache-related bugs are some of the most likely to go undetected since if you don't test for them end-to-end, they're really not that easy to spot & diagnose. An article sticking around too long on the home page. Semi-stale data creeping into your pipeline. Someone's security token being accepted post-revocation. All really hard to spot unless (1) you're explicitly looking, or (2) manure hits the fan. |
|
- Using asynchronous database replication and reading data from database slaves - Duplicating same data over multiple database tables (possibly for performance reasons) - Having additional system that duplicates some data. For example: in the middle of rewriting some legacy system - a process that was split into phases so functionality between new and old systems overlap for some period of time.
Based on my experience I always assume that inconsistency is unavoidable when the same information is stored in more than one place.