|
|
|
|
|
by 8note
1589 days ago
|
|
if youre not extracting a profit from people enjoying the art, why are you advocating for it? what is your skin in the game? if youre only advocating it to get rid of it by selling it, i dont think thats a genuine advocacy for the piece. im unclear that this scarcity is different from making a wordpress site with n posts, each one being a picture generated with the different parameters. i think the website version is better, even, since you as the artist can pick out the best individual items when producing the single art work that is "n pieces generated by this algorithm" i dont think it really unlocks anything new. Whats different is having tooling that makes it easy to do |
|
To be sure, a lot of the "advocacy" is exactly what you describe, where people are just trying to push their bags. But the advocacy I'm talking about is more about the social element of discussing the art with other people in the community.
The website is certainly a valid way to display a limited generative art collection, but it's a different experience. It means that the artist _can_ curate the collection and hide some of the rough edges of the algorithm... but then it loses some of its magic. NFTs have sort of enabled a new sub genre of generative art [1].
[1] https://tylerxhobbs.com/essays/2021/the-rise-of-long-form-ge...