|
|
|
|
|
by eatonphil
1587 days ago
|
|
While the table doesn't say that much about intent (other than what you might infer from the SQL Compatibility, ACID and Category columns), I had hoped it was clear from the rest of the article that I was saying there is no relationship between the wire protocol and being PostgreSQL compatible in general. > It does NOT encompass the actual query language itself, let alone database semantics. > This doesn't mean that any PostgreSQL or MySQL query will work with them since, as mentioned previously, query language and database semantics are independent of the wire protocol. > To reiterate, the wire protocol doesn't specify anything about the query language. > Just because a database implements the PostgreSQL wire protocol does not mean it intends to be a drop-in replacement for PostgreSQL. > So just looking at parser support is not enough to talk about PostgreSQL query or semantic compatibility. But it is a starting point. But I guess it wasn't clear. |
|