|
|
|
|
|
by vaporstun
5386 days ago
|
|
> _foo_bar=Something&baz=Else > could parse as either of: > {foo:{bar:"Something",baz:"Else"}} > {foo:{bar:"Something"}, baz:"Else"} I don't think this is right, or at least, it shouldn't be right. I think _foo_bar=Something&baz=Else should only parse as {foo:{bar:"Something"}, baz:"Else"}. {foo:{bar:"Something",baz:"Else"}} should be _foo_bar=Something&_foo_baz=Else It should be possible for the writer of the article to fix this without major changes. |
|
This makes sense, but is not what I or the author was suggesting. Note that it is somewhat repetitive (foo appears twice). In contrast the new suggestion simply has an possible ; to disambiguate these possibilities.