Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by istorical 1590 days ago
I think its a problem of people being forced to be on Red Team or Blue Team.

Both Red Team and Blue Team are dissatisfied with increases in crime, with more homelessness, etc.

Red Team has a narrative that policing has softened, that district attorney's offices have stopped prosecuting street crimes or let people out too early, that we have lost order.

Blue Team has a narrative that these crimes and homelessness problems need to be addressed through social safety nets, fixing income inequality or housing scarcity, etc. Basically focus on upstream changes rather than the street-level stuff. And also has a separate concern about police brutality or corruption.

A rational actor can likely see that there are merits to all of the above concerns and ideas. A rational actor could perhaps find a pragmatic answer that attempts to solve for all of these concerns, expresses empathy for each of these intersecting problems, and builds consensus.

But we are just full tribal, anti-working-across-the-aisle, full argue against strawmen versions of the other tribe, so that can't happen anymore.

Combine our current lack of the principle of charity with our two party system and we're fucked.

1 comments

I mean I don't disagree. We could get past this with social reforms AND better police funding. I mean that's what would have happened when I was a kid. Compromise and both red and blue get something they want.