Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kspacewalk2 1594 days ago
Let dictators push whatever story they want. Serbia was a belligerent pariah and suffered economically for it. When the dictator was ousted it stopped being a belligerent pariah and benefited economically from that. That's all that matters in the long run.
2 comments

It's not like that, sanctions make it harder to overthrow a dictatorship.

On one hand, 90% of people can only hear official media. With sanctions, they have much easier job telling that someone else is to blame.

On the other hand it makes much much harder for political opposition to fight that narrative, to propose opening the country towards West when they're clearly acting against population through these sanctions.

That's why these sanctions benefit regime, and that's why they're double evil - hurt people + make it harder for opposition to fight the dictator.

In Serbia's case, sanctions didn't help at all with overthrowing Milosevic. They just brought misery to ordinary people and he remained in charge through the 90-ties.

It took loosing all the wars, getting country bombarded by NATO and de facto loosing control over Kosovo, getting entire opposition united, and massive protests to remove him from the power.

i agree the us policy in the balkans is an overwhelming success. bosnia and herzegovina prospers and is more stable than ever [1]. kosovo and serbia are best of friends [2]. there is almost zero corruption and gdp is through the roof [3]. there are no children being born with defects and there has been zero cancer cases due to nato dropping depleted uranium [4]. as far as former yugoslavia is concerned, only slovenia is dirt poor

[1] https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/bosnias-next-crisis/

[2] https://www.rferl.org/a/serbia-kosovo-dialogue-dead-selakovi...

[3] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locat...

[4] https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2019/12/26/depleted-urani...

[5] https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/groups/Former-Yugo...