[Dwelve]

So if it's profitable for Youtube and Twitter to push for a war and ban all dissenting voices you wouldn't feel there's a need to discuss whether or not that's a good thing, you'd instead have an argument about whether or not private companies should be able to do that?

There are far more interesting issues at hand and if you pretend this is a discussion about the legalities of this behaviour instead of a question about where idiotic self-harming nonsense like this leads our society you're being deliberately obtuse.

[jakelazaroff]

The difference between this and YouTube/Twitter is that those two aren't paying a hundred million dollars to publish content like that.

Anyway, I'm not pretending anything; I'm just answering GP's question.