[Strom]

> Why can you safely assume that?

Based on his achievements. His achievements are extremely rare. Even most MDs (medical doctors) don't have groundbreaking research to their name, doubly so on specifically the topic they're discussing.

> more interested in what his equally credentialled peers are saying, which is that he's full of shit.

That interests me the most too. Unfortunately all the coverage I've seen thus far doesn't have any takes by equally credentialled peers - that is peers who have spent decades researching mRNA. Most coverage doesn't even have takes by MDs, nevermind equally credentialled.

[_clhx]

Most other people who worked on the vaccine in a similar capacity to him disagree with him, no?