[kodachrome64]

What about when the CDC publishes an article with a title like this? https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/s0806-vaccination-pr...

Critical thinking would mean asking how could a vaccine that simulates part of the virus provide better immunity than recovering from the real thing?

Turns out, it doesn't. But the latest release doesn't have a catchy sound bite for a title. The results are buried in the summary: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7104e1.htm?s_cid=mm...

The same goes with masks back in 2020. While officials were announcing that masks may actually be detrimental for the average person, hospitals were screaming for more PPE. Clearly, something wasn't adding up. As it turns out, that was a lie.

I'm vaccinated, I was a big supporter of lockdowns at the beginning of all of this, but "trust the science" is, ironically, becoming its own religion to some people and I find it repulsive. Especially when it has been shown time and again that science can be wrong and that scientists have no problems with telling noble lies.