[lostlogin]

This is a good comment and still underplays the cost of MRI. Getting a reasonable 3T setup going will be a lot more than US$1 million. Running costs are very high, with a scanner lifetime service contract being somewhere between 50% and 100% the original cost of the MRI scanner.

Additionally, the scanner cost is only part the price. There is the Faraday cage, chilling, room setup, building strengthening, scanner install and shipping cost, peripheral equipment (compatible monitoring, injectors, compatible beds and chairs etc). It probably comes in at a doubling of the cost of the actual scanner.

While reducing the cost of the install and running will help a lot, the staffing is the larger cost in radiology, as techs and radiologists are expensive.

Costs will vary hugely depending on where you are in the world, but it isn't cheap anywhere.

[ska]

I was intentionally handwaving but above is about right in orders of magnitude, i just rolled things up.

Staffing is an interesting one (which I ignored, but good point you can't really) - lots of potential deployments of a small machine like this probably don't look anything like a US standard imaging suite, and aren't going to be staffed the same way. If you run all the numbers in detail you get big variations here, depending on set up.

[heartbeats]

Why so expensive? Couldn't you just site it way out in the boonies? If you put it on a giant purpose-built concrete cube, it seems like most of this stuff becomes cheaper.

[lostlogin]

It still needs a Faraday cage to keep RF in and out, it need chilling and people have to be able to get there.

Scanner location is absolutely a driver in where people get their imaging done. People want good parking and a nearby location.

If the building is being purpose built it is a lot easier, as retro fitting steel isn’t cheap.