[ternaryoperator]

Mine would be a much larger collections library. Having come to go from Java and finding that the standard go library has no trees, no stack, no skip list, etc. was quite a surprise. Possibly the advent of generics will stimulate development of a more robust standard collections library.

[christophilus]

It does have a doubly-linked list which can easily serve as a stack, though. And it has a heap which is a poor man's replacement for some uses of tree. I've found that I can get quite a bit farther with the built-in Go slices, maps, and lists than I thought.

But yeah. Now that generics are in, I do hope they add a handful of common collections.

[0] https://pkg.go.dev/container/list@go1.17.6

[1] https://pkg.go.dev/container/heap@go1.17.6

[2] https://pkg.go.dev/container/ring@go1.17.6