Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by abrahamepton 1597 days ago
This is so f’ing stupid, and in that way perfectly epitomizes what’s so broken about crypto.

Nobody wants to run their own bank, which ALSO means nobody wants to use Jim’s shady internet bank or their buddy’s bank or their mom’s bank or or or…

Like, nobody in crypto seems to think for one second about how the world actually works or what people not brainwashed by crypto might want.

It’s a tech that has thoroughly, definitively lost the argument. It’s as clear a dead end as the metaverse, or pivots to video (let alone Meta/FB’s pivot to video)

3 comments

Ironically your response is the tone-deaf and stupid one here.

The person you're replying to isn't arguing for people to be using "Jim's shady internet bank" or a random buddys bank, they are discussing the ability of current trusted actors to act as custodians and insurers for cryptocurrency-wallets, hiding the scary and difficult aspects of cryptocurrency, while operating on top of an open-source, trust-less, publicly auditable, open base-layer like a blockchain.

They are saying it's possible to regard cryptocurrency as a base-layer for economic transactions, and that without it it's basically not possible today to leave the traditional banking world behind if one wants to maintain a digital presence. Don't you think it should be? Why should an individual be forced to have someone else be custodian for their wealth?

Cryptocurrencies also aren't really finished yet, there are a lot of improvements to be made before it is possible to replace the existing financial infrastructure and maintain its scale.

> Cryptocurrencies also aren't really finished yet

It’s been 14 years. When will they be “finished”? What does that look like? What are the goals?

It seems to me like the original goals failed (take over the world, everyone use Bitcoin like cash) and so the goalpost moving began (sidechains, PoW “soon”, NFTs, etc).

I’ve seen nothing of value produced out of 14 years if hype. Only wasted resources and what seems to be an accidental Ponzi scheme.

Remember this comment when in 10 years there's a bitcoin balance alongside your usd balance in your bank account.
> This is so f’ing stupid, and in that way perfectly epitomizes what’s so broken about crypto.

> nobody wants to run their own bank

It sure looks like A LOT of people do. The real question is why are you so mad about it?