[jacobjuul]

enable js?

[scim-knox-twox]

Why? All content is already loaded, but it's covered by loader.

Every site should be usable without CSS / JS. Nobody remember Progressive Enhancement nowadays?

https://wikiless.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement?lang=en

[jacobjuul]

but asking the author (who didn't even submit this link), to change his website due to your preference of not using js seems a bit priviliged. Enable js, or move on.

[scim-knox-twox]

Don't comment, move on…

> but asking the author (who didn't even submit this link)

Why I should ask author, who submits this link? I'm asking author of this article, submitting has nothing to it.

> to your preference

It's not my preference, it's standards. Suggest read about it.

[jacobjuul]

author of the article

[josefx]

On an untrusted site, where the content is readily available in the source view? No thanks, malware and other cryptominers are still a thing.

[levesque]

I've been browsing some website with js disabled and I must say, when it doesn't completely break a website (ex. website with paywalls or relying heavily on dynamic content), it feels like a much better version of the web. No flashy pop-ups, no randomly reloading content, no video ads every 2 paragraph, no banners(!).

Wouldn't say malware and js cryptominers are a big worry of mine though, unless you go on really disreputable websites.

[hansel_der]

useless use of js is a thing