|
|
|
|
|
by mr_spothawk
1591 days ago
|
|
> long-debunked lol. > Defining inflation as a function of supply distracts us from the real-world problems causing broad-based increases in price. price is a function of supply and demand already. you don't need to redefine inflation unless you're trying to dupe feeble-minded rubes. |
|
The "supply of currency units" is a fundamentally inadequate measure to capture this. It is too simplistic. Nobody takes it seriously except for a small group of very vocal online crackpots because it is so obviously unfit for purpose. [1]
We re-defined it as our understanding grew. The way we update practically any model in the face of new evidence.
Japan single-handedly demolishes the Austrian model. Their M2 supply grew 3X from 1990 to present but inflation remained 0% measured over thirty two years. Prices did not change from 1990 to 2022. [2, 3]
[1] https://www.pragcap.com/understanding-why-austrian-economics...
[2] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/JPNCPIALLMINMEI
[3] https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/money-supply-m2