Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by NovemberWhiskey 1602 days ago
Even if you accept the amazing, faulty premise inherent in this comment (see the other response for more on why one shouldn't), the timeline is misleading.

For example, TARP (about $475bn) was more than 93% recovered by the end of 2012. The bank-related programs had already over-recovered $23bn versus the $245bn disbursement by that point with approximately a 4% internal rate of return.

1 comments

Not to mention the inflation rate between 2008 and 2010 was -4% and then 0% for a hot minute thereafter. Factoring that, plus the 4% nominal return, meant that the programs yielded something like 8-10% annualized real returns.