| > Genuinely curious: what issues are you specifically referring to? When central bank/governments lose control or get greedy you end up with hyperinflation. Should I go into examples of how hyperinflation has been catastrophic? > we don't actually know what the limit is because wallets have gotten lost and will continue to be lost. We know the limit but we don't know how much is being circulated. Central bank money is the opposite, you know roughly how much is being circulated (if you're government is nice to you) and there is no limit. > The impact of derivatives to effectively increase the supply Derivates don't increase the money supply itself, they play tricks using the underlying asset. If you hold the Bitcoin asset yourself, someone playing with derivatives means very little to you. Though if you have your balance on an exchange, that's on you. On the other hand, in the current system, you have no access to the underlying asset. You don't own 0.00001% of the central bank. In other words, everything you are using _is_ a derivative. Even something as simple as keeping your money in the bank means you are using a derivative. That being the option of the bank to hold no reserves for the money you deposited. |
Instead you have hyperdeflation. Wonderful.
> Derivates don't increase the money supply itself, they play tricks using the underlying asset.
That's why I said "effectively".
> If you hold the Bitcoin asset yourself, someone playing with derivatives means very little to you.
That's complete nonsense. There are countless examples where derivatives have affected the price of the underlying asset. I gave several. Derivatives drove up the price of GameStop. The subprime mortgage collapse devastated house prices even for people who didn't hold a mortgage at all.
> On the other hand, in the current system, you have no access to the underlying asset.
Let's be honest: you don't have access or any control over the underlying crypto asset either. 0.00002% is really 0%. Bitcoin is concentrated in very few hands [1]. The vast majority of BTC is held and not traded [2]. Lots of people are holding ("hodling") BTC on the expectation that the price will continue to rise.
That's... a bubble. Eventually that sentiment will turn and some large unaccountable players will simply dump it and get out.
> In other words, everything you are using _is_ a derivative.
No, it isn't. The cash itself is the asset. What gives it value is that it is backed by [insert government here].
> Even something as simple as keeping your money in the bank means you are using a derivative.
No, you're trusting your money to a custodian that is overseen by the government.
> That being the option of the bank to hold no reserves for the money you deposited.
Again, wrong. Banks are required to hold a portion of their assets and loans in hard currency. This is the fractional reserve system.
A lot of former gold bugs love crypto. They too are under a lot of misconceptions (eg the USD has never once been 100% backed by gold). Additionally, fiat currencies are a response to the problems created by trying to peg assets to other assets yet we're going to learn those same lessons with so-called "stablecoins".
[1]: https://fortune.com/2021/12/20/001-percent-bitcoin-holders-c....
[2]: https://news.bitcoin.com/only-3-5-million-bitcoin-is-traded-...