|
|
|
|
|
by cbg0
1592 days ago
|
|
This is based on the recommendations in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3177 A relevant snippet: > This means that we feel comfortable about the prospect of allocating 178 billions /48 prefixes under that scheme before problems start to appear. To understand how big that number is, one has to compare 178 billion to 10 billion, which is the projected population on earth in year 2050 |
|
Edit: oh, wow I misread that completely. It's 17.8 /48 ranges per person on average. Yep, that should be enough for quite a while.