|
|
|
|
|
by e12e
1594 days ago
|
|
> One of the issues I found with http clients I looked into is that they often don't provide enough functionality to hook into the request process. Either before or after a request is executed to add to the headers or parameters of the request or getting the results of the request. I find that httpkit (or just mitmproxy) often gives me decent insight to the actual requests. I don't know about altering requests "in flight" - I typically re-issue the request via curl or my application server (eg: rails console or debugger breakpoint). Strongly considering purchasing httpkit - but so far I've just needed it occasionally. I feel like postman etc is closer to println Debugging, while just intercepting the traffic is more like using a real debugger. But I guess I can see why some like postman etc for exploration - so far i prefer swagger for that (or soapui for xml/soap - preferably running soapui under httpkit for the best of both worlds). https://httptoolkit.tech/ |
|