[speed_spread]

I doubt an AI could be trained to do that. Anything that cannot be transpiled mechanically probably requires a human decision which will involve analysis and tradeoffs between objectives that the AI could not know about.

[gnulinux]

With enough work, anything a human does can be automated. Unless you believe human brain does something non-computable (like e.g. Godel), which makes you a dualist which comes with its own philosophical baggage (how do different types of ontologies interact?).

[speed_spread]

Sure, the machine could "make a call" and pick a way of doing things, but that machine wouldn't be the one supporting the resulting code for years afterward. Past a certain point, some technical decisions become value judgements because of their impact on humans.

[yjftsjthsd-h]

One need not delve into philosophy to observe that, in practice, humans can do many things that we have yet to make machines do successfully. I admit that this is like solving the halting problem by saying "yes" (https://xkcd.com/1266/), for better and worse.

(But seriously, I think it's fair to say "as of 2022, no, AI can't do that")