|
>> It's unfortunate the only thing she was convicted for was defrauding them, since being accredited investors they should be able to live with that. NO. Investors are supposed to be able to live with all the usual risks of technology, execution, marketplace dynamics, etc. They are NOT supposed to be OK with deliberate fraud. If you invest at Early_Round when the tech looks promising, but then it fails to develop, CEO truthfully tells everyone what failed, the plan to overcome the failures, and you invest in Later_Round, or don't, and it ultimately fails and you lose your investment, fine. BUT, if you invested in Early_Round and then the tech fails to develop, but the CEO straight-up lies to you and says they are "light years ahead of everyone else", shows phony endorsements from major industry players, and more so that you invest again in Later_Round, and then lose your shirt - that's fraud, and all involved in the fraud should be prosecuted, convicted, and jailed. Anything less will create an environment where blatant lying for 100s-of-$millions is okay, and that is doomed to systemically fail. |