|
|
|
|
|
by michaelmrose
1597 days ago
|
|
You would do well to read the other cases concerning offensive speech that have passed over the near 80 years since that case. Fighting words now requires qualifications like "produce a clear and present danger of a serious intolerable evil" and “imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.” In subsequent cases even literally burning a cross on your lawn wasn't deemed "fighting words" The doctrine is very nearly hallow. So hallow that should I yell in your face I'm going to get you alignItems! I shall have to add right now with the candlestick so it should qualify! https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/959/fighting-wo... |
|