|
|
|
|
|
by housecarpenter
1594 days ago
|
|
You might be interested to know that in intuitionistic logic, you still have a one-sided contrapositive law, i.e. (A > B) > (~B > ~A): [1] A > B(assumption)
[2] ~B (assumption)
[3] A (assumption)
[4] B (modus ponens on 1 and 3)
[5] ~A (proof of negation on 3, 4 and 2)
It's only the converse that no longer holds. In general familiar equivalences from classical logic are still valid in intuitionistic logic but only in one direction. |
|