Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kryz 1598 days ago
Yeah, why would you not be entitled to that content for no commercial consideration…

Frankly I don’t understand the ethical position of people who use ad-blockers.

1 comments

The publisher offered the content to the viewer at no cost, so why would the viewer be obligated to provide commercial consideration? It's not illegal or immoral to consume only part of the content that is provided. This applies to print, radio, and TV, and there's no reason it shouldn't apply to the internet.