[toomuchtodo]

> Which I guess means my question is why don’t you believe them and how likely is it that they are lying when they claim thy appeals are reviewed by a human?

Why would we believe them? It's Google's responsibility to prove their assertion, versus regulators taking them for their (not so good) word. The default should be the assumption that the corporation is being dishonest.

[ben_w]

If you’re taking them (or anyone else) to court, isn’t the burden of proof on you?

[toomuchtodo]

Highly dependent on the law or regulation in question.