|
|
|
|
|
by foobarbazoo
5381 days ago
|
|
From the customer's perspective, they are not two separate businesses. They are one, strong business (well, were). Streaming is most valuable when DVD is (a) there as a backup, and (b) managed with the same system. Netflix has seriously decreased the value of their streaming offering by separating out the DVD and de-integrating their systems. There is basically no reason to pay for Kwikster now (terrible name BTW), and the streaming is now an extra cost. We'll have our kids use Amazon Prime, which we already pay for. They're much less choosy for content anyway, and it cuts off another monthly bill. Someone inside of Netflix should have had the balls to tell your CEO this was a stupid idea and customers would hate it. |
|
I joined Netflix because of streaming and I prefer to look at streaming only. When I joined netflix I got a DVD and didn't return it for a year. I didn't want to return it because I didn't want to get another DVD. In search results I never wanted to see the DVD results. I wanted to see what I could watch now. Content is such a key part of this. If the streaming service had the same or more content than the DVD business, nobody would care. But since they are still building that collection and struggling with content owners, people are freaking out.
Time will tell whether this was a stupid idea for the market at large. As a streaming customer, I'm indifferent. As a tech pundit, I think it was an important strategic move and I applaud Netflix.