| So this actually a historial thing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_town I couldn't find anything about protests but people did go on strike in Pullman-Lesson: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_town#Pullman_lesson > Should we take away people's right to protest in that city, since doing otherwise would be compelling speech by the company? I guess, if they didn't like the protesters, they would just say any protesters are on their property and they have the right to eject them or never even let them in. Whilst it was never built (for other reasons) a good example is the Garden Bridge in London. [1] Despite this looking like publib infra: "All groups of eight or more visitors would be required to contact the Garden Bridge Trust to request a formal visit to the bridge,” states Lambeth council’s planning report to its committee, which recommends conditional planning. “This policy would not only assist visitor management but also would discourage protest groups from trying to access the bridge.” [2] Obviously this hasn't been tested at the city level, but the direction of travel ain't great. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_Bridge
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/architecture-design... |