|
|
|
|
|
by nyolfen
1607 days ago
|
|
race is strongly correlated with major continental population groups; e.g black-identifying americans have roughly 400x african genetic markers vs white-identifying, forensic anthropologists can identify the continental ancestry of skeletons at ~80%, etc. it is of course a human and particularly bureaucratic taxonomy so it breaks down at the margins, but it points to something that exists in reality and can be used to establish useful correlations (for instance, medical issues) on average. |
|
The Irish used to be a "race" unto themselves. Jewish people still are according to many people (I wonder if an Ethiopian Jew is of the Black race or the Jewish race?). Ukrainians were called their own race in my part of the world, Western Canada, during an immigration wave 100 years ago.
I suppose it's possible that all those old guys had it wrong and used "race" improperly, but we're doing it right now because we use skin tone as a proxy for race instead of other factors.