Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zepto 1603 days ago
How is that good for the bottom line?
2 comments

Saw a post on reddit today that basically had a restaurant laying down the law:

Absolutely no food shall be taken home at the end of the shift this includes: Messed up food, no-shows, and PAID food that you buy yourself. (Probably because of the employee discount)...

For restaurant workers who probably struggle putting food on the table, this is just a slap on the face. They can definitely afford to feed their workers dinner and even their whole family back at home nightly and not lose much. I used to run a restaurant back in 2010 and would let my staff at least take home some food a few nights per week, esp when we had a good week and good profit returns. We were on a tight budget but they were happy working there!

The reason these rules exist is because otherwise there will be abuse.

I worked at a large retail store before. And they also forbid taking anything home even if it’s broken. Because there are of course cases of people purposely breaking things to take home.

I also worked at a large retail store before, which also forbid taking things home if they were broken.

We had a that was damaged from being a display item, but only cosmetically. They wanted us to throw it in the trash compactor, instead of donating it to a coworker had a kid at 19, single mother, and made 7.50/h.

We snuck that crib out the back and hid it behind a dumpster while my buddy came to pick it up for her.

Possible abuse isn't a reason to have shitty policies.

Bosses can force workers to do their bidding. Think getting overtime work without overtime pay because people are scared of walking away.
That part is obvious, but it seems like it would only be clearly beneficial for menial or hourly labor.

For work where decision making and creativity are important, you’d expect it to be counterproductive.