[sandworm101]

That explains the contradictory statements I've seen over the years. The program can view the entire sphere over a period of a year, but at any one moment the telescope only has access to see stars within a particular plane. So it isn't available for ad hoc targeting of interesting things as they happen (nova, transits etc) unless they are in the plane of available options at that moment.

That also meshes with the cultural issued behind the scenes. JWST has always been more of an stellar astronomy and cosmology instrument. It won't be much use in looking at closer/moving things like Oumuamua or phenomena like Tabby's star transits that occur at very particular times. So it isn't an instrument for so-called "planetologists", which is the hot field in modern astronomy but was barely a thing when JWST began.

[Keysh]

Of course JWST is an instrument for studying exoplanets (among other things). Something like 24% of the first year’s approved observing proposals are for doing just that. There are coronagraphs in two of the main instruments, all specifically meant for exoplanet observations.

https://eos.org/features/overture-to-exoplanets

[sandworm101]

Exoplanets are one type of planet and their detection is really just a subset of stellar astronomy in that it relies on stellar instrumentation. The hot stuff these days is within the solar system, especially since since the Pluto flyby. Minor plants, planet X, extra-solar objects (Oumuamua) and the hunt for life within our solar system ... these are the big areas of public interest in the next decade and will be the focus for planetology (I still cannot say that without thinking of Herbert).

[Keysh]

OK, you're really not making much sense. I mentioned exoplanets because that was a (barely) plausible interpretation of something that was a "hot field in modern astronomy but was barely a thing when JWST began", since the preliminary studies for JWST did happen in the mid-1990s, when exoplanets were first beginning to be found. The actual serious design work, though, was in the early 2000s, when exoplanets were definitely a hot topic.

But if what you really mean is "within the solar system" (which, um, excludes "Tabby's star"), well... "barely a thing when JWST began" is complete nonsense. I mean, studying things within the solar system is something astronomy has been doing for literally thousands of years. (And, no, it hasn't suddenly become "the hot field" in any sense, leaving aside the point that there are multiple things that might be considered "hot fields" at the moment, and that there's never a single "hot field" anyway.)

JWST is perfectly useful for solar-system science: there are about 22 approved Cycle 1 General Observer proposals in that field, including one specifically meant for any "interstellar object" (like 1I/'Oumuamua or 2I/Borisov) that might show up during the first year: https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/phase2-public/2337.pdf

And the second-largest set of Guaranteed Time Observation proposals (proposals from "scientists who helped develop the key hardware and software components or technical and inter-disciplinary knowledge for the observatory"), after "Extra-solar Planets", is "Solar System": https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/approved-progra...