|
|
|
|
|
by pilif
1606 days ago
|
|
If I was in the position of having to review that PR, I would probably flat-out reject it and ask for just the minimal changes required. I don't see how adding an additional capture framework backend would require meaningful changes to the build system. With some likelihood, in this case, Apple probably won't have the resources to rework their PR and thus the PR will stay un-merged until somebody of the project has time to merge/reimplement the relevant parts. Which of course is a total shame and I wonder why Apple didn't have "mergeability" in mind when they decided to create their PR. They must have known that "rework the build system" can't be part of a PR adding a capture backend if they wanted any chance of this being merged. |
|