[ksec]

>As long as they don't take it as an excuse to reduce bitrates further.

I actually think it is easier ( comparatively speaking ) to push for improved Networking so someday bitrate becomes less of a concern. Just like what happened with Audio. Even with the state of the art VVC Encoder, you only get about 65% ( or 2.8x ) reduction in bitrate in most common cases compared to x264. 65% reduction in 20 years isn't exactly a lot. We have easily got 20x bandwidth reduction in cost in the past 20 years.

Netflix are testing with 800Gbps per box now. May be when PCI-E 5.0 is available along with higher memory bandwidth they could try 1.6Tbps per box within the this decade.

[Sunspark]

Lots of people have plenty of bandwidth. I certainly do. It's the service providers who refuse to send it. It's pretty pathetic, because if you obtain a 4k to 1080p re-encode from a third party, you will get a better picture quality than what the services send directly as 1080. They will not send a 4k bitrate stream to a lower resolution display, so it's necessary to patronize third parties.

It's only since covid that they latched onto the excuse propagated by idiots out there that the internet couldn't handle people watching video from home, and immediately jumped on it as an excuse to cut quality to save a penny. Executive bonuses all around. Clap clap.