Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fatnoah 1598 days ago
I'm also in my mid-40's and did the leetcode for a MAANG interview a couple years ago. I also looked at it as a thing I'd spend some time on every now and then to shake off the rust and to practice for the hiring process itself.

Like my past studying for SAT or LSAT, it was as much about preparing myself for the test itself vs. trying to gain some specific knowledge. Time management, making sure to test, and knowing that there are almost always naive vs. optimized solutions for these types of problems and learning how to quickly identify the naive solution (i.e prove I can solve) and then figuring out the optimization.

In any case, I enjoyed the process and didn't really practice more than 10-15 hours. I literally just kicked off the rust and got used to managing time. If you get too deep in to "I've optimized systems to process millions of transactions/second, and some 25 year old is sweating me on hashtables" you're going to have a bad time.

The ironic part of the interviews at this level of experience was that the coding portions ended up feeling tough, but I was able to talk work through them. For one company, one of the two system design round was with someone who couldn't have been more than 3 years out of college (with PhD though) and had only been at that big company. That was my hardest interview because the person I was talking to had zero to little actual experience there. They knew the problem and expected answer, but didn't know the space. It was VERY HARD to talk about things that they very obviously didn't understand in terms that they did understand without sounding condescending.

2 comments

If we're going to change Facebook to M for Meta then we should change Google to A for Alphabet. Then the acronym is MAAAN.
On LinkedIn, FB employees have Meta now; Google employees still have Google.
It reminds me of Pacino in Scarface. Chichi get the yayo MAANG!
Does it really matter enough to correct people? Call it fang, faang, fang+, mang, maang, maaan, top tier companies... They all mean the same thing.
NAAAM, a tour in NAAAM
AMAAN!

I still don't know if I'm reading amen or a man.

Triple A could work as M3AN.
So you got offers from FAANG with only 10-15 hours of actual practice? That’s an exceptionally low amount of practice.

But I hear these stories over and over - the variance is so wildly high. The people who spent the same or more hours studying and didn’t get an offer tend to not talk about it though. So, sampling bias issue.

The more studying you do, the more likely the interviewer asks a question you've seen before.