[Zenst]

I recall GDS being initiated for internal DOH stuff circa John Major, going into Blair era (yip was there when Blair took over the role).

Not that I'd attribute it to any PM, believe it was driven by the government security services (which department/flavor I could not say).

That all said, it may of been a different aspect but certainly has a longer story than told. With that, it started as an intranet project iirc.

https://gds.blog.gov.uk/story/ has some insight but that seems more to cover the more public web aspects and even they say it is "a story" not "the story".

So be fascinating to peace the "full story" and history together.

GDS was a whole catchment in the early days, that included the phone services and that was contracted to Mercury telecom at one stage, or aspects were. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_Communications

If any credit should be laid, it would be upon the civil servants and associates that came up with the initiative, who sadly will probably remain nameless even if their names were known. Politicians just green light so much and claim credit, so much goes on behind the scenes of any government. With that, best think of politicians as orchestra conductors who depend upon musicians knowing how to do things, often able to do things right without eye sight of the conductors at times.

[unfocussed_mike]

There was a significantly renewed manifesto-driven push to open source/open standards with the coalition in 2010; some of gov.uk really is down to Cameron rejecting the (Microsoft/EDS/Fujitsu-heavy) approaches of the previous administrations.

I don't really like giving them credit for anything but there it is.

[ColinHayhurst]

Agreed and thank you for the memory jogging link: https://gds.blog.gov.uk/story-2010/

Martha Lane Fox, bless her.

And the brilliant Tom Loosemoore, also behind https://www.theyworkforyou.com/

https://www.writetothem.com/

https://www.fixmystreet.com/

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/

[toyg]

What is there now was significantly rehashed under the first Cameron administration. I remember talking to a few insiders at PyconUK, around 2010-11, and they were saying they basically had carte blanche to nuke it all from orbit and rebuild how they saw fit. The government wasn't particularly popular at the time (what with the sweeping cuts to social services), but the people in question were adamant that, on digital services at least, the big guys really wanted to make a difference for good, and that it was a clean break from the past - hence why they were going to places like PyConUK to recruit motivated forward-looking people. That government effectively lasted 5 years, so they did a lot of work in that timeframe. I later heard through the grapevine that the waters got choppier after 2016, and I've not really heard anything after 2019 (beyond the occasional coded grumble on twitter), so I don't know how things are today.

> it would be upon the civil servants and associates that came up with the initiative

From what I understand, the power of this was precisely that it came from people outside the career civil service. Although this narrative came from Conservative quarters (who occasionally indulge in civil-service bashing), I find it credible. Established powers in the system tend to have established friends among deep-pocketed vendors, particularly these days that doors tend to revolve quite furiously. For all the good they did elsewhere, one undoubtedly bad legacy of the Blair-Brown years was eccessive trust on friendly vendors vs in-house.