[stickfigure]

You still need the enforcement regime. Restaurants/bars/etc must have someone at the door scanning everyone's QR code (and cross checking it against a photo ID). Law enforcement must run stings against restaurants to ensure they're checking properly.

It's gross.

[jsnell]

Restaurants can have the ID check done by the waiter when taking the order. There is very little overhead, certainly no need to employ an extra person to check papers at the door. I doubt any law enforcement is running random stings. They would probably wait for members of the public to report this first.

I don't think checking IDs is gross, and obviously if you do, there is nothing I could say to change your mind. But it doesn't change the fact that Covid passports are easily implementable with paper, there is no need for the to be "holographic picture ID".

[stickfigure]

You seem to have latched on to the least important part of what I've said. Yes, a centralized database combined with always-on internet access can suffice instead of holographic cards (in the same way that nowadays, police officers don't really need to look at your drivers license - they can just look you up from their car), but that's strictly worse from a privacy/dystopia perspective. And it does not work at all for offline dining.

Holographic cards would actually be better since it doesn't notify a central authority where and when everyone dines. You seem to be comfortable with the idea that "party of 6" sits down, and the waiter spends the next 5 minutes screwing with his phone scanning everyone's (printed?) QR codes and verifying faces. I would rather get covid.

Here in the US, ABC boards do in fact run stings on bars and restaurants to make sure they are checking ids. And yes history has shown that it is absolutely necessary if you want compliance.

[jsnell]

There is no need for a centralized database or always on internet access. How did my description suggest that either would be needed? As the verifiee, you need to print a piece of paper and have an ID. As the verifier, you need an offline app. No central authority is notified of the scan. None of this is rocket science, it is basic public key cryptography.

It does not take 5 minutes either. In practice it takes about 5 seconds to scan and validate the cert.

You have built an elaborate fantasy of how bad the system would be, rather than look at how the systems deployed for half a billion people actually work. Literally none of your stated fears actually bears out in practice. Suggesting you'd rather just get Covid is just depraved.

[stickfigure]

OK, I'll concede that PK cryptography can be used to eliminate the online requirement given that you don't need a revocation mechanism. You're still going to need active measures to ensure restaurant compliance. And signing these without a centralized database at the signing authority? Theoretically possible, practically impossible.

Tell me, where is it that these systems are working for half a billion people?

I'm guessing this is somewhere with a vastly different cultural landscape than the US. Depraved or not, I still value what little anonymity I have left.

[jsnell]

This is how the EU (and some associated countries) have it set up. One obviously would like to centralize the signing just so for some basic auditing and to limit the number of public keys that get installed. But that just means a central signing service, it does not need to have persistent storage in said central location. In practice having the generated certs in a central DB is very useful for the users though, since it makes it trivial to install the certs on a new phone etc.

[chopin]

I certainly wouldn't want to go to a restaurant which checks my ID.

We're heading to a state of affairs where you can't move in public anonymously. This is a dystopian nightmare.