|
|
|
|
|
|
by jrochkind1
1610 days ago
|
|
|
OK, phew, it's not just me! I guess I misinterpreted when you said "And you might find out you don't really even need a cache. Rails + Postgres read replicas are pretty dang fast." You actually meant, you might not need a CDN cache... if you have some other kind of cache (which btw ideally isn't redis if you're using our model anyway)... because Rails actually isn't pretty dang fast at all? OK then! :) |
|
|