> But aside from such special cases, we shall not count robot hazards and artificial intelligence hazards as information system hazards
Yes, it needs a [2011] tag on it. Because:
>There is, however, another way for robot- and AI-related risks to enter our information hazard taxonomy. They can enter it in the same ways as any risk relating to potentially dangerous technological development
is already happening. Given those autonomous decision without humans in the loop (e.g., flag some file as copyrighted), it isn't a basic-potential-risk, it's reallity.
Yes, it needs a [2011] tag on it. Because:
>There is, however, another way for robot- and AI-related risks to enter our information hazard taxonomy. They can enter it in the same ways as any risk relating to potentially dangerous technological development
is already happening. Given those autonomous decision without humans in the loop (e.g., flag some file as copyrighted), it isn't a basic-potential-risk, it's reallity.