[thrwawy283]

I just wanted to say I appreciated this comment. You clearly condensed what the problem is, and now I feel like I better understand the situation. It does sound like hypocrisy but in an unworkable, non-starting situation for the FSF.

(Bravo.)

[giantrobot]

Thanks. I understand what the FSF is trying to do. I just think they've gone about it in a stupid way. I see it as an outgrowth if Stallman's old "microwave argument".

He is super zealous about using free software everywhere...until he isn't. His argument being that something like a microwave, despite having some non-Free software, isn't something that can be changed post-sale so he's ok using them.

1. It's actually an outdated example since we're now seeing appliances with Internet connectivity and EULAs.

2. It breaks down almost immediately with modern computer hardware. We're not running big beige towers whose only connectivity is some RS323 ports on the back. Most people are running computers with multiple highly regulated radios, internal batteries, and security subsystems. Fully user programmable functions of these are combinations of impractical, dangerous, and illegal.

I still donate every year to the FSF but these crusades just make me slap my forehead. They're feel good campaigns and encourage more harm than good.