| I love these technologies, thanks for engaging with me about them. IR roughly meant NIRS - was just playing fast and loose with the modality for 'things that suffer from extreme scatter that I believe will prove impossible (for the intended use) for the foreseeable future' MRIs as I understand it align then flip water molecules that are a super easy signal to read, it comes down to stitching techniques and the hardware affordances to make that easier. So, now I'm more curious, you believe you solved the scatter issue but were supply chain constrained? Your assessment is also mine: spatial and temporal resolution requirements drive which sensing techniques one would use. My aims were consumer based, so much less concerned about precision, more analysis turn around time. EEG was torture, yet rewarding in that realm - though to many techie's dismay, it only offered a single bit of resolution > I still think that's enough. Edit: If it's still not clear what I mean (I am not a grad student in any respect), I think that anything one has to 'inject' then read the reflection is a suboptimal approach to reading the naturally emitted (albeit amplified) signal. |