|
|
|
|
|
by elnatro
1613 days ago
|
|
That’s nonsense in Italy and Germany there are other languages/dialects too and nobody changes the name to the main common language. The case of English is different as the language was mainly used una part of the country, while Spanish rapidly extended to all regions. |
|
The status of languages like Castillan is much more controversial, because they are only the national dialect by conquest. (French is in a similar position, though it cleverly shares the name with the country it is the national language of.) It doesn't help that the French and Spanish governments have historically suppressed "dialects" in favour of the national language in an immoral and shameful way.
>The case of English is different as the language was mainly used una part of the country
English is the most used language throughout the UK. There are almost no non-English-speaking communities left in Wales or Scotland, and language (much like everything else to do with the English) is a contentious political issue in Northern Ireland.
However, it would be grossly inappropriate to start calling this language "British", even when just referring to how it is spoken in the UK - because of many of the same historical features as Castillan and French.