Ok third time it worked. It gives a lot of words to change for my company homepage. Some feedback:
- spelling: it recommends a lot of 'did you means' but I meant none of them. Maybe you can compile a list with 'typical website words' such as (looking at my results) FAQ, "&", whitepaper, GDPR, EULA, etc. Also, it recommends to change words with apostrophes before it e.g. < 'Bring your own device' > --> did you mean bring and device
- low converting words: this is a cool concept! However, most of the words singled out CAN be weasel words or filler words or whatever, but not in their current context. E.g. "as well as" -> the well isn't a filler word there. E.g. ""Save up to 80%" -> up isn't a weasel word here. Et cetera.
Overall: very nice project, curious to see how it evolves!
Thanks a lot for the feedback, I will integrate it into version 0.2! I will exclude some of the more obvious false positives such as the apostrophes you mentioned. My thought was to overshoot in the beginning for the false positives and adjust later on.
- spelling: it recommends a lot of 'did you means' but I meant none of them. Maybe you can compile a list with 'typical website words' such as (looking at my results) FAQ, "&", whitepaper, GDPR, EULA, etc. Also, it recommends to change words with apostrophes before it e.g. < 'Bring your own device' > --> did you mean bring and device
- low converting words: this is a cool concept! However, most of the words singled out CAN be weasel words or filler words or whatever, but not in their current context. E.g. "as well as" -> the well isn't a filler word there. E.g. ""Save up to 80%" -> up isn't a weasel word here. Et cetera.
Overall: very nice project, curious to see how it evolves!