Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by digisign 1609 days ago
Recording sensitive information then relying on your perfect performance to remove it is flawed opsec. Not to mention a waste of time, as our great ancestor mentions.
1 comments

It’s not a career ending thing if somebody saw my commit history. It’s just mildly embarrassing. It’s not a waste of time either… time spent crafting a final commit from the whole change, writing a descriptive commit message, and documenting everything well helps people review it, and that’s time well spent.
Ok, that's one strategy. However, we put that information in our issue tracker, docs, and source code comments, where more people can reach them more easily. Commit msg is PROJ-1234, which gets automatically gets linked to issue with design and comment history and project/product folks can contribute.
I’m lost. What are you arguing at this point?
The ancestor stated, all this futzing with commit history is a waste of time. I tend to agree.