Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by IiydAbITMvJkqKf 1611 days ago
All ISPs in my country run their own recursive resolvers (with IPs resolving to my country). How "big" a resolver is does not matter at all - it's not a social network; the resolver either works or it doesn't work.

Some of the root servers are also in the EU, so there is zero dependence on the USA for resolving european ccTLDs.
2 comments
plainnoodles 1611 days ago
There is some level of importance in bigness. All the major public resolvers let nameserver operators (well, anyone, really) clear cached records. Which turns out to be a not-uncommon occurrence. I wrote my own DNS server, so I've been paying a ton of attention to this stuff, and I've found several scenarios where website operators (even, for instance, instagram!) seem to have wanted to change some DNS records but weren't happy with the TTLs they'd advertised on them, and instead of waiting them out, just cleared caches with the major resolvers and then gone ahead and turned off the old IPs.

With the end result that I had to go in and remove those records from my cache, too.

link
throw0101a 1611 days ago
> Some of the root servers are also in the EU, so there is zero dependence on the USA for resolving european ccTLDs.

What percentage of the organizations that run the root servers are non-US? There are thirteen logical root servers ([a-m].root-servers.org):

* https://root-servers.org/

Three (i, k, m) are not run by non-US legal entities: Netnod (SE), RIPE (NL), WIDE (JP).

link