| >"Sources lacking in credibility make claim without evidence" Sure, if you like, there is no need to debunk the claims. Let's not bicker and argue about that, as I certainly have no idea. I still, perhaps pedantically, would claim that "no need to debunk" is different from "has been debunked". Regardless, the breathtaking size of this isolated bubble of disinformation is worthy of note. Four bubbles I see in the original comment: Alex Jones, Joe Rogan, people who believe false things about Rittenhouse and then there is... ...most of the US government, media, and Democratic party.
It's like saying a typical American breakfast is orange juice, cereal, and an aircraft carrier.Maybe it's true! But it sure raises a lot of questions, and something funny is going on if people don't even agree that one item in the list stands out. Something even funnier is going on if people get mad at you for noticing. People who make fun of conspiracy theories. Remember that's where this started, a comment on how prone people are to believing in conspiracies. You can't trust the establishment! Still, big conspiracy. |