|
|
|
|
|
by Shared404
1617 days ago
|
|
> - I feel that they are linux only. They're actually better on Free/Open BSD in my experience. As stupid as it makes me sound, I often struggle to parse Linux man pages, but the BSD's I've had no trouble with for a variety of topics. > - I feel that a small amount of plain text documentation should be stored in the executable, Isn't this how --help usually works? I would also rather have more documentation embedded, at least for some executables. |
|
Comparatively, I’ve found NetBSD documentation to be lacking, although NetBSD seems to take the cake on code quality and legacy architectures (a feature I find my delve right now.
On the wider discussion of doc, I’ve found Linux kernel documentation to be a pain in the ass, and sometimes ever worse than windows kernel documentation (which I won’t even both to get into)