|
|
|
|
|
by bko
1608 days ago
|
|
> Fiat currencies are used in literally every country on the planet and have been through the largest economic booms in history. Limited/hard currencies on the other hand, have a 100% failure rate with one ongoing experiment happening right now in El Salvador. Which would I rather bet on? Something has existed for tens of thousands of years and in the last 50 years has been supplanted by something else. Which would I bet on surviving 1,000 years from now? Hard currency. |
|
1. The earliest known currency was the shekel and it was more of a accounting instrument and it was used ~5000 years ago.
2. Fiat was invented in the 7th century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money#China
Regarding your claim that hard money is good.
We are talking about a system that completely floundered under pressure from economic expansion (hard money) vs a system that has been presiding over the largest economic booms in history and is currently adopted by every government in the world (fiat) and your argument is "well look which is older".