|
|
|
|
|
|
by hasjekyll
1612 days ago
|
|
|
Completely agree - the quality of peer-review is a lottery. Sometimes you get an excellent referee making good points, other times you get a referee solely focussed on making sure you cite their work. And, occasionally, you get a referee who doesn't even appear to read the paper and just waves it through. |
|
|