| > The deer samples were anywhere from 14% to 70% COVID19 infected. ...with an overall rate of 36%, which is given in that very article that you linked. It doesn't matter if 70% of the deer at one site were infected, if the average is significantly lower than that. ...which isn't even relevant, because again, you're moving the goalposts, as stated above. > You're grossly underestimating the amount of COVID19 we have spread to the deer population I'm not underestimating anything, as one of the researchers said: "there is no documentation of deer transmitting the virus to humans or vice versa"[1] (another article which you have linked but apparently failed to read). ...and, as a previous study found[2], the virus does not spread effectively outdoors. You're literally fabricating claims from thin air. There's absolutely no evidence whatsoever for effective human-deer or deer-deer COVID transmission. [1] https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/2022/01/07/deer-ohio-inf... [2] https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-updates/2021/08/how-safe-ou... |