|
|
|
|
|
|
by rosndo
1617 days ago
|
|
|
This isn’t about selective enforcement, the current legislation simply does not work the way you would like it to work. > You have the direct opposite (originally) for Youtube - unbound scope with narrowly defined no-go zone (illegal and copywrite protected material). This isn’t true, youtube has a far bigger no-go zone than you suggest. |
|
|